I beat Mass Effect 2. Review forthcoming (fingers crossed).
HIS 403: We moved out of the immediate post-war years and into the '50s and '60s. Specific focus on the economic explosion that was supposed to appear and fade quickly but ended up sticking for years, in the West at least. We're going to discuss the importation of foreign workers to fill labor shortages next week, which has much to do with current Europe and its identity crisis problem. The powers also start to lose much of their imperial territory, with decolonization rapidly starting. Looked at the new youth culture and its universal impact not just in Europe but in many parts of the world, coming mostly from the dreaded scourge of America. Relating to that, the "Americanization" of Europe was discussed. On the Eastern side, we focused on how things changed in the Eastern block after Stalin's death. Particular focus on the 1953 uprising in East Germany, the 1956 one in Hungary, and the Prague of Spring of 1968. These were all stopped by direct Soviet intervention. Khrushchev may have wanted to GTFA from Stalin, but he could still get clamp down with the best of them. And in '68 under Brezhnev...well Czechoslovakia probably got off easy, since 'ol Leonid was Uncle Joe Jr. Oh yeah, and Walter Ulbricht, leader of the SED and basically the authoritarian ruler of East Germany, got Nikki's permission to build a big wall in 1961.
And in other HIS 403 news, I've started seriously working on my research paper, focusing broadly on Chechnya. I'm still working out my thesis statement, but I've been lucky to find some good books and especially an excellent journal article that looks at the Chechen Wars from a military/operational standpoint. I want to talk about counterinsurgency some in the paper, so this was a great find. Reading the information and seeing the horrors committed by both sides, you have to feel for the civilians caught in the middle. Just some tidbits: Kidnapping makes up the largest portion of Chechen GDP. The corruption in the Russian military is so high that the number one source of arms and supplies to the Chechen guerrillas is the Russian military. The author of one of the books I'm using, Anna Politkovskaya, was assassinated two years after its publication, as were several of her comrades that worked for or contributed to the activist newspaper she was associated with. Everyone alleged to be connected to the killing was acquitted. And last but not least, the Chechens infamously held an entire theater in Moscow hostage over the occupation in 2002. The Russian government's response? They gassed the building, killing all the terrorists and 130 of their own civilians...
In MMA land, we found out that James Toney will not get to KO Kimbo for his first fight, at least probably not soon. Slice is still set to fight Matt Mitrione, while Toney does not yet have an opponent. Not much of significance from Sengoku 12. Akihiro Gono picked up a decision win over a weak opponent. Maximo Blanco delivered a brutal head-kick knockout. And Jorge Santiago won his rematch against Mamed Khalidov. While not MMA, Manny Pacquiao returns to the boxing ring today against Joshua Clottey. It's not the Mayweather super-fight, but Pac-Man has already achieved legendary status and is must-watch.
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Not Some Kind of Sage
The stars have exploded and I have more material.
At the end of Mass Effect 2, so maybe I can crank that review out next week.
Bought a significant amount of comics for the first time in several years. Hey, how often do you find a booth with everything 50% off AND a good selection? Rarely, and the last place I expected was in the swamp of Metropolis, Illinois. I got every Hellboy trade I didn't have except for one and a BPRD trade. Mondo Mignola.
The only thing I watched this week was Ichi the Killer. Well, I thought for a majority of the film that it was satire and absolutely brilliant, but then towards the end that wavered. There's some duality going on that reshaped what I was thinking. Enjoyable nevertheless. For sure: no one can do pain mixed with...sexual grime or something, quite like Asians.
In HIS 403 we looked at the aftermath of World War II.. Plenty of stuff in there about the Cold War not being a certainty until around 1948 and how Stalin and the other Allies went from a relative consensus to complete opposition. We also talked about De-Nazification and overall punishment towards collaborators, which was basically the Nuremberg Trials...and we're done, Hitler is still a BAMF. The political makeup mirrors the overall relations between the powers. Stalin is all about this Popular Front strategy...until the countries in the east are still so scared of Germany they're like, "Yes, please protect us Russia, communism is gold" and the countries in the west think Stalin sucks. Then it's Blockade time, but America shuts that down in a Berlin minute or a year, take your pick. Stalin wants time to recover, some cooperation, and a ton of territory everywhere. The West has some problems there and so it's time to party like it's 1949 in West Germany. Unlike consumer goods, Stalin wants his own Germany, so it's East Germany to the rescue soon enough. The people in the east get to watch the Social Democratic Party and German Communist party do the authoritarian fusion dance into the SED and we're set for approximately forty years of fun.
Upset central at WEC 47 this past Saturday. I thought people were underestimating Joseph Benavidez, especially with Torres coming off a brutal loss, but even I would've picked the mulleted Mexicano. Torres seemed docile on the feet and while he didn't take much damage on the mat he still got dominated. Jens Pulver may have had a badass walkout shirt, but that couldn't save him from the submission firestorm of Javier Vazquez. Pulver is a legend no matter how many fights he keeps losing but time passed him by long ago. It would've been great to see him get a win and just disappear, but that seems ever more unlikely. In the main event, Brian Bowles never really got anything going against Dominick Cruz, who has some of the most unorthodox striking I've seen. Bowles broke his hand with the first punch he threw, which certainly affected him. I'm assuming Benavidez will get the next shot at Cruz and the 135 belt, in what from here looks like a very interesting matchup between two young guys now at the top of the division.
At the end of Mass Effect 2, so maybe I can crank that review out next week.
Bought a significant amount of comics for the first time in several years. Hey, how often do you find a booth with everything 50% off AND a good selection? Rarely, and the last place I expected was in the swamp of Metropolis, Illinois. I got every Hellboy trade I didn't have except for one and a BPRD trade. Mondo Mignola.
The only thing I watched this week was Ichi the Killer. Well, I thought for a majority of the film that it was satire and absolutely brilliant, but then towards the end that wavered. There's some duality going on that reshaped what I was thinking. Enjoyable nevertheless. For sure: no one can do pain mixed with...sexual grime or something, quite like Asians.
In HIS 403 we looked at the aftermath of World War II.. Plenty of stuff in there about the Cold War not being a certainty until around 1948 and how Stalin and the other Allies went from a relative consensus to complete opposition. We also talked about De-Nazification and overall punishment towards collaborators, which was basically the Nuremberg Trials...and we're done, Hitler is still a BAMF. The political makeup mirrors the overall relations between the powers. Stalin is all about this Popular Front strategy...until the countries in the east are still so scared of Germany they're like, "Yes, please protect us Russia, communism is gold" and the countries in the west think Stalin sucks. Then it's Blockade time, but America shuts that down in a Berlin minute or a year, take your pick. Stalin wants time to recover, some cooperation, and a ton of territory everywhere. The West has some problems there and so it's time to party like it's 1949 in West Germany. Unlike consumer goods, Stalin wants his own Germany, so it's East Germany to the rescue soon enough. The people in the east get to watch the Social Democratic Party and German Communist party do the authoritarian fusion dance into the SED and we're set for approximately forty years of fun.
Upset central at WEC 47 this past Saturday. I thought people were underestimating Joseph Benavidez, especially with Torres coming off a brutal loss, but even I would've picked the mulleted Mexicano. Torres seemed docile on the feet and while he didn't take much damage on the mat he still got dominated. Jens Pulver may have had a badass walkout shirt, but that couldn't save him from the submission firestorm of Javier Vazquez. Pulver is a legend no matter how many fights he keeps losing but time passed him by long ago. It would've been great to see him get a win and just disappear, but that seems ever more unlikely. In the main event, Brian Bowles never really got anything going against Dominick Cruz, who has some of the most unorthodox striking I've seen. Bowles broke his hand with the first punch he threw, which certainly affected him. I'm assuming Benavidez will get the next shot at Cruz and the 135 belt, in what from here looks like a very interesting matchup between two young guys now at the top of the division.
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Dropped
This week was pretty lackluster in giving me stuff to blog about, but I'm trying to build a routine, so off we go.
Went to a talk by Desmond Tutu, one of the main people responsible for ending apartheid in South Africa. Pretty big name for Murray, Kentucky. I was glad to see so many people there. They had to move it from a mid-size auditorium on campus to the basketball stadium. His theme seemed to be humanity, and how, as Spiked online will tell you, it is underrated. He went after not only the Iraq War but also the one in Afghanistan. You rarely hear someone bring the latter up in the negative. I'm not sure I even agree with him, but it's sort of refreshing. Sadly I had forgotten all the high points by the time I got to my car, after hearing every other person say they couldn't understand him. Wow, you have to LISTEN at a lecture. I guess that message got blocked somehow.
Still playing Mass Effect 2. It's still fun...hey, I warned you.
Attended a research presentation by a graduate student on the role of Stasi informants in East Germany. I have a boner for European affairs anyway, and Germany specifically guarantees a new set of pants. The research was interesting, showing how the methods of the Stasi changed over time and how effective they could be. He also addressed the question of why people, outside of the ones who were compromised in some way, would want to voluntarily work for the Stasi. The answer was many of them simply enjoyed doing intelligence work, which is something I never would have thought of but makes total sense. But of course, nothing can go totally well. Background: Yes, I know the guy who gave the presentation is a graduate student, so he is held to a higher standard, and especially with entering a world so congested as the one of history invites scrutiny. But man, oh man did the professors go after this guy while simultaneously trying to show off how who had read more books. A caveat: The presenter is studying German history, which in the world of historical research, means you damn well better know German or you are an insult to existence. So he has studied the language to the extent that he can interpret official records and oral interviews in German, not to mention he was in Austria for a full semester where he was able, I'm assuming, to accumulate his information across the border. I'm not saying the guy has earned a free pass, but clearly he has put some serious work in. I doubt he did all this so he can fabricate numbers to put into his master's thesis and then go on to change the way we forever look at German history on a complete lie. But sure enough, I'm setting there and a professor asks, "How accurate are your sources?" I might have fainted, I can't remember.
We had a test in HIS 403, so nothing new.
No major MMA action either. The Strikeforce Challengers card told us that Luke Rockhold is probably ready for a step up, maybe onto one of the regular shows, and that Sarah Kaufman can run through someone as over matched as Takayo Hashi any day. Was there anything else interesting? Well, perplexing stuff about Tim Sylvia, who I would think should be glad to still have a career. He apparently turned down a fight with Josh Barnett in Japan. Now obviously Barnett has lost some luster after his 'roid shenanigans effectively killed an entire promotion, but declining that fight, in Japan, where there is no drug testing, against a very region-popular fighter like Barnett seems dumb. Hell, Sylvia is a big guy. Let me put on my stereotype goggles and tell you something: the Japanese love big guys. Sylvia could be the next big thing over there and fight Jose Canseco. Instead, the "Maine-iac" (how could you ever root for someone with that nickname?) is looking at a rematch with Wes Sims. Wes Sims! The guy that just got plowed under by Bobby Lashley while looking like he should be on life support. For God's sake, the fight was already scrapped in Ohio because the athletic commission ruled it uncompetitive. How often do you hear that!? Thankfully there is a megaton of MMA coming up in March, so we can put goofus on the backburner.
Hopefully I can do better next week.
Went to a talk by Desmond Tutu, one of the main people responsible for ending apartheid in South Africa. Pretty big name for Murray, Kentucky. I was glad to see so many people there. They had to move it from a mid-size auditorium on campus to the basketball stadium. His theme seemed to be humanity, and how, as Spiked online will tell you, it is underrated. He went after not only the Iraq War but also the one in Afghanistan. You rarely hear someone bring the latter up in the negative. I'm not sure I even agree with him, but it's sort of refreshing. Sadly I had forgotten all the high points by the time I got to my car, after hearing every other person say they couldn't understand him. Wow, you have to LISTEN at a lecture. I guess that message got blocked somehow.
Still playing Mass Effect 2. It's still fun...hey, I warned you.
Attended a research presentation by a graduate student on the role of Stasi informants in East Germany. I have a boner for European affairs anyway, and Germany specifically guarantees a new set of pants. The research was interesting, showing how the methods of the Stasi changed over time and how effective they could be. He also addressed the question of why people, outside of the ones who were compromised in some way, would want to voluntarily work for the Stasi. The answer was many of them simply enjoyed doing intelligence work, which is something I never would have thought of but makes total sense. But of course, nothing can go totally well. Background: Yes, I know the guy who gave the presentation is a graduate student, so he is held to a higher standard, and especially with entering a world so congested as the one of history invites scrutiny. But man, oh man did the professors go after this guy while simultaneously trying to show off how who had read more books. A caveat: The presenter is studying German history, which in the world of historical research, means you damn well better know German or you are an insult to existence. So he has studied the language to the extent that he can interpret official records and oral interviews in German, not to mention he was in Austria for a full semester where he was able, I'm assuming, to accumulate his information across the border. I'm not saying the guy has earned a free pass, but clearly he has put some serious work in. I doubt he did all this so he can fabricate numbers to put into his master's thesis and then go on to change the way we forever look at German history on a complete lie. But sure enough, I'm setting there and a professor asks, "How accurate are your sources?" I might have fainted, I can't remember.
We had a test in HIS 403, so nothing new.
No major MMA action either. The Strikeforce Challengers card told us that Luke Rockhold is probably ready for a step up, maybe onto one of the regular shows, and that Sarah Kaufman can run through someone as over matched as Takayo Hashi any day. Was there anything else interesting? Well, perplexing stuff about Tim Sylvia, who I would think should be glad to still have a career. He apparently turned down a fight with Josh Barnett in Japan. Now obviously Barnett has lost some luster after his 'roid shenanigans effectively killed an entire promotion, but declining that fight, in Japan, where there is no drug testing, against a very region-popular fighter like Barnett seems dumb. Hell, Sylvia is a big guy. Let me put on my stereotype goggles and tell you something: the Japanese love big guys. Sylvia could be the next big thing over there and fight Jose Canseco. Instead, the "Maine-iac" (how could you ever root for someone with that nickname?) is looking at a rematch with Wes Sims. Wes Sims! The guy that just got plowed under by Bobby Lashley while looking like he should be on life support. For God's sake, the fight was already scrapped in Ohio because the athletic commission ruled it uncompetitive. How often do you hear that!? Thankfully there is a megaton of MMA coming up in March, so we can put goofus on the backburner.
Hopefully I can do better next week.
Monday, February 22, 2010
Paperwork
It's been several months since I did this. I am going to try and do posts with a lot of short items so that it will be easier to try and get momentum. I never posted anything I put much significant effort into, even though not from lack of trying. I was just never happy with any of the longer ideas I had.
I'm a couple hours into Mass Effect 2 and enjoying it. I bought Modern Warfare 2 at the end of last semester, which covered my video game base for around three months. The multiplayer is addicting, but after enough time I just needed a change. I played through a friend's copy of the first Mass Effect and liked it well enough, but it had some substantial flaws. Still, I'm a sucker for Bioware games, specifically their RPG's. Plus, I had a $40 gift card, so I went ahead and bought Mass Effect 2. Speaking of my attempted longer posts, I had a draft of a review of Mass Effect months back, after I played it. Maybe I'll try and do one for ME2 if I get time.
Complaint Department: So I got an all-essay test in my History of Modern East Asia back today and I have some qualms with my grade of an 83. I've never taken one of this teacher's tests before and we weren't provided with a study guide, so I was a little unsure of what to expect. I thought everything went pretty well. I knew the ID terms well enough and I thought I wrote a solid essay for the second part. I lost the most points on my essay, for what I see as mainly superfluous reasons. An example: in my closing paragraph about the Opium Wars and the aftermath, I wrote that Britain now controlled trade in the entire region. My teacher wrote a comment that said, "What region?" Now, clearly I meant East Asia, or what of it was available at the time, since Japan, the other main focus of the class, was still officially closed but starting negotiations with the Americans. I'm going to cut this one short because I just want to keep going and I feel like I'm being...oversensitive, maybe? An 83 is still a B, but China is in a region self evident from the damn title of the class.
Of and on, lately I've been trying to read some comic scans regularly. Previously I had only checked out notable stuff I found on Journalista, most of which was old EC/pulp stuff that is only in print in ridiculously priced hardcovers. The stuff most available is manga, so I'm going to get back into Pluto and 20th Century Boys. I started a little of Vagabond and Blade of the Immortal. The caveat is I still cannot get used to reading comics on a digital screen. I figured the uncomfortableness would fade, but it hasn't. In my last post I was a complaining 15 year old, and in this one I feel like I'm 70.
What did I interpet from UFC 110? Chris Lytle has a ground game, Cro-Cop can't run through over matched opponents anymore, George Sotiropolous is a contender at lightweight, Keith Jardine cannot get anything going, Wanderlei has actually changed his fighting style, and Big Nog could be on the downward slope. Oh, and Cain Velasquez just keeps dominating.
What did I learn in History of Europe Since 1914 last week? We ran through World War II for the whole three hours. Pretty quick treatment, but I know Dr. Pizzo wants to get past the information the majority of the class knows the most amount about. From Mark Mazower's excellent book Dark Continent, we had a chapter discussing the Nazis from 1938-1945. Some good stuff in there about Albert Speer, the later German Minister of Armaments and War Production. He was incredibly smart, didn't blindly listen to Hitler, and managed to bring their war production up to levels where they were actually competitive. The Allies were lucky he wasn't in charge from the beginning. From Benjamin Liberman's Terrible Fate, we looked at the Nazis overall plan for Eastern Europe, focusing mostly on occupied Poland. Smaller sections were devoted to the ethnic cleansing in Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, the former Yugoslavia, Ukraine and the mass deportations and internments of the USSR. At any spot in Europe, there's probably a decent chance some group was ethnically cleansed during the 20th century, especially in the East. From our regular textbook, we looked at the broad particulars of the conflict, most of which was review for me.
I also attended a lecture from a visiting professor on honor in British India. It was a fairly standard talk, but he did have some interesting photographs from the era. I also got another reminder how brutal the Age of Empire was. After the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857, the British responded in their typical brutal fashion. Hindus traditionally cremate their dead to allow for reincarnation, but a full body is required. Seizing on this, the British took many Hindus and strapped them to the front of cannons and fired them. Christ.
Watched The Hurt Locker. Some excellent, tense action sequences throughout, and not in the traditional way you might be thinking. And yes, the film is apolitical, but it does show the ridiculous facet of fighting a 21st century counterinsurgency and how difficult it is. Very effective character development arc for Jeremy Renner's lead that reveals just enough along the way to keep you wondering until it slams you in the face during the last five minutes.
I'm a couple hours into Mass Effect 2 and enjoying it. I bought Modern Warfare 2 at the end of last semester, which covered my video game base for around three months. The multiplayer is addicting, but after enough time I just needed a change. I played through a friend's copy of the first Mass Effect and liked it well enough, but it had some substantial flaws. Still, I'm a sucker for Bioware games, specifically their RPG's. Plus, I had a $40 gift card, so I went ahead and bought Mass Effect 2. Speaking of my attempted longer posts, I had a draft of a review of Mass Effect months back, after I played it. Maybe I'll try and do one for ME2 if I get time.
Complaint Department: So I got an all-essay test in my History of Modern East Asia back today and I have some qualms with my grade of an 83. I've never taken one of this teacher's tests before and we weren't provided with a study guide, so I was a little unsure of what to expect. I thought everything went pretty well. I knew the ID terms well enough and I thought I wrote a solid essay for the second part. I lost the most points on my essay, for what I see as mainly superfluous reasons. An example: in my closing paragraph about the Opium Wars and the aftermath, I wrote that Britain now controlled trade in the entire region. My teacher wrote a comment that said, "What region?" Now, clearly I meant East Asia, or what of it was available at the time, since Japan, the other main focus of the class, was still officially closed but starting negotiations with the Americans. I'm going to cut this one short because I just want to keep going and I feel like I'm being...oversensitive, maybe? An 83 is still a B, but China is in a region self evident from the damn title of the class.
Of and on, lately I've been trying to read some comic scans regularly. Previously I had only checked out notable stuff I found on Journalista, most of which was old EC/pulp stuff that is only in print in ridiculously priced hardcovers. The stuff most available is manga, so I'm going to get back into Pluto and 20th Century Boys. I started a little of Vagabond and Blade of the Immortal. The caveat is I still cannot get used to reading comics on a digital screen. I figured the uncomfortableness would fade, but it hasn't. In my last post I was a complaining 15 year old, and in this one I feel like I'm 70.
What did I interpet from UFC 110? Chris Lytle has a ground game, Cro-Cop can't run through over matched opponents anymore, George Sotiropolous is a contender at lightweight, Keith Jardine cannot get anything going, Wanderlei has actually changed his fighting style, and Big Nog could be on the downward slope. Oh, and Cain Velasquez just keeps dominating.
What did I learn in History of Europe Since 1914 last week? We ran through World War II for the whole three hours. Pretty quick treatment, but I know Dr. Pizzo wants to get past the information the majority of the class knows the most amount about. From Mark Mazower's excellent book Dark Continent, we had a chapter discussing the Nazis from 1938-1945. Some good stuff in there about Albert Speer, the later German Minister of Armaments and War Production. He was incredibly smart, didn't blindly listen to Hitler, and managed to bring their war production up to levels where they were actually competitive. The Allies were lucky he wasn't in charge from the beginning. From Benjamin Liberman's Terrible Fate, we looked at the Nazis overall plan for Eastern Europe, focusing mostly on occupied Poland. Smaller sections were devoted to the ethnic cleansing in Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, the former Yugoslavia, Ukraine and the mass deportations and internments of the USSR. At any spot in Europe, there's probably a decent chance some group was ethnically cleansed during the 20th century, especially in the East. From our regular textbook, we looked at the broad particulars of the conflict, most of which was review for me.
I also attended a lecture from a visiting professor on honor in British India. It was a fairly standard talk, but he did have some interesting photographs from the era. I also got another reminder how brutal the Age of Empire was. After the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857, the British responded in their typical brutal fashion. Hindus traditionally cremate their dead to allow for reincarnation, but a full body is required. Seizing on this, the British took many Hindus and strapped them to the front of cannons and fired them. Christ.
Watched The Hurt Locker. Some excellent, tense action sequences throughout, and not in the traditional way you might be thinking. And yes, the film is apolitical, but it does show the ridiculous facet of fighting a 21st century counterinsurgency and how difficult it is. Very effective character development arc for Jeremy Renner's lead that reveals just enough along the way to keep you wondering until it slams you in the face during the last five minutes.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
UFC 105: Lightning Round
Been a while since I've thrown around predictions, but I'm only going with three most prominent main card fights. I didn't watch Ultimate Fighter Season 9, nor have I ever seen Pearson or Wilks in action, so I'm passing.
Bisping vs Kang - Bisping is looking for a win after being on the receiving end of a likely candidate for knockout of the year, courtesy of Dan Henderson, at UFC 100. Kang is trying to do something he's had trouble with his whole career, string together a series of wins. Bisping is still not in the top mix at 185 lbs, but I still him as the favorite here. I see this being a standup battle that Bisping will control all the way to a unanimous decision win. Kang could make things interesting by trying to put Bisping on his back, where he seemingly never ends up. As long as Bisping avoids dangerous spots on the ground he should be alright.
Swick vs Hardy - Dan Hardy is a guy who has impressed me in both his Octagon fights. He seems to place himself as brawler, but he seems more like a slick counter-striker to me. And I honestly think people are sleeping on him in this fight. Swick has earned the right to be the favorite here, but who of signifigance has he ever beaten? This is his first real test at welterweight and he shouldn't make the mistakes Marcus Davis did if he wants to win. I'm picking Hardy in this one by split decision. Whoever wins should enjoy the moment while they can, before the realization that they have to train to be taken down and worked over for twenty five minutes by GSP in several months.
Vera vs Couture - Eventually Couture is going to lose his tenacious fighting spirit, but he's got a good chance of keeping it going in the main event. Vera dominated in his last fight, albeit in a methodical and lackluster way that won him no fans. He also has a history of cracking under pressure against tougher fighters. Both guys have very good clinches, so look for those exchanges. I would say Couture definitely has the wrestling edge, and even though Vera isn't helpless on the ground, he should have problems with Couture being able to control him. The striking favors Vera, but he might need to be a little looser with his hands than in his last fight to score points and damage, though once again he might worry about getting taken down. While Vera is a young, solid test at his new weight of 205, I still think Randy takes it, by unanimous decision.
Bisping vs Kang - Bisping is looking for a win after being on the receiving end of a likely candidate for knockout of the year, courtesy of Dan Henderson, at UFC 100. Kang is trying to do something he's had trouble with his whole career, string together a series of wins. Bisping is still not in the top mix at 185 lbs, but I still him as the favorite here. I see this being a standup battle that Bisping will control all the way to a unanimous decision win. Kang could make things interesting by trying to put Bisping on his back, where he seemingly never ends up. As long as Bisping avoids dangerous spots on the ground he should be alright.
Swick vs Hardy - Dan Hardy is a guy who has impressed me in both his Octagon fights. He seems to place himself as brawler, but he seems more like a slick counter-striker to me. And I honestly think people are sleeping on him in this fight. Swick has earned the right to be the favorite here, but who of signifigance has he ever beaten? This is his first real test at welterweight and he shouldn't make the mistakes Marcus Davis did if he wants to win. I'm picking Hardy in this one by split decision. Whoever wins should enjoy the moment while they can, before the realization that they have to train to be taken down and worked over for twenty five minutes by GSP in several months.
Vera vs Couture - Eventually Couture is going to lose his tenacious fighting spirit, but he's got a good chance of keeping it going in the main event. Vera dominated in his last fight, albeit in a methodical and lackluster way that won him no fans. He also has a history of cracking under pressure against tougher fighters. Both guys have very good clinches, so look for those exchanges. I would say Couture definitely has the wrestling edge, and even though Vera isn't helpless on the ground, he should have problems with Couture being able to control him. The striking favors Vera, but he might need to be a little looser with his hands than in his last fight to score points and damage, though once again he might worry about getting taken down. While Vera is a young, solid test at his new weight of 205, I still think Randy takes it, by unanimous decision.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Movies
I reactived my Netflix account, so here's some capsule reviews.
Charley Varrick - 1970s crime picture that was hyped up in the excellent backmatter of Criminal, the Ed Brubaker and Sean Phillips comic series everyone should be buying. Great performances by Walter Matthau as the lead bank robber and Joe Don Baker as the hitman put onto him after Varrick ends up with mob money on accident. Story is very well plotted out, with no ridiculous intrusions or characters showing up out of nowhere to solve the problem. If you like crime drama, it's well worth your time.
Blue Velvet - The first David Lynch film I've ever watched. The famous symbolism is actually more blatant than I was expecting and to some might seem ridiculously apparent and lacking in effect. I didn't really have a problem with it and at the time I can see it being totally fresh. Also now potentially stale is the focus on stripping back the idyllic framing of small-town America, but Lynch is smart enough to not go totally overboard into some hard-boiled, over-the-top thriller and instead keeps everything grounded enough to where the unease slowly creeps up on you rather than it being loud and constantly in your face. Oh, and Dennis Hopper's character is really menacing in the best, unpredictable way.
Dr. Strangelove - Peter Sellers is tremendous and the film does a great job of laughing at the complete insanity of the Cold War period and how it could affect the people in positions of power. A great black comedy.
Gattaca - I think this is considered by some to be one of the better, newer sci-fi movies but I just could not get into it. The story breaks down into a really pretentious self-empowerment tale of overcoming, no matter what the odds, don't give up hope, you can't quit! The genetics focus is kind of interesting, but as a consequence of the ever advancing nature of sci-fi (for better or worse), it all seems tame and rehashed. The art style also really bugged me, with this potential near-future technology merged with a retro American vibe that never gets an explanation. The performances seemed flat and didn't do enough to make up for the lackluster other parts.
The Constant Gardener - One of the recent tales that exposes those nasty corporations for their nefarious deeds that shit all over the world and turn us all into mindless trademark machines. Fortunately that predictable and pointless premise is overshadowed by the nuances and reality of the relationship of main players Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz. The film also has a very rough, under-produced feel that helps to reinforce how the film plays out. This might be a thriller, but none of these characters suddenly morph into Jason Bourne so we can see a half-baked shootout. I mean, I like The Fugitive plenty, but enough already. The ending sadly returns to Importantville again so we can show how once we bust one corrupt person, everything will change. Don't pay attention to the legions waiting in line behind him. On actually promoting a message well, the film does prominently showcase the horrors and problems facing Africa without actually screaming it to the rafters.
Blood Simple - The Coen Bros. first movie didn't grab me as all their others I've seen have. It certainly has potential and the story contains their often requisite crazy angles that breaks down into a somewhat standard drama with crime elements. The idiosyncratic characters are toned down quite a bit or completely absent and the humor is relegated to a few sparing moments, though still embedded with the ridiculousness of everyday life that packs their later films. More so than all that is the film seems bogged down, lacking their usual verve and snap. It's by no means bad, but just sort of there. Overall, it failed to really grab me and make me take notice. Would I feel different if it wasn't a production of the two brothers I've come to heartily admire? Probably. As it is, good but they've done better.
Barton Fink - Watching this afterwards, however, was like good ol' Joel and Ethan flicking the lights straight back to bright. While definitive statements from me should be viewed with a skeptical eye and carry little meaning, this is the most postmodern film I've ever seen. So if you were agitated by No Country for Old Men, do not get near this beast. Anger will flourish and rampages will bloom. The plot is set up quickly and never really develops past an initial stage of John Turturro as a playwright reaching out to the common man, lured away by Hollywood. He's excellent as always, as is fellow Coen staple Jon Goodman. If you like heaps of metaphors, allusions, comparisons and reflections on topics ranging from intellectualism, famous writers and fascism, find this thing. I'm sure as hell glad I did.
Planet Terror - I don't see how people can condemn Death Proof while anointing this as hugely superior. Well, I guess I can, and what I'm really saying is I disagree. The big flaw I see is that Rodriguez cared more about making a tribute to the Grindhouse ideal than actually creating a strong overall work, which in a way is the opposite of what Tarantino did. In the face of the praise I just couldn't get past being underwhelmed. There are some good performances and running ideas throughout, like the restaraunt owner who never gets a customer yet still searches for the perfect BBQ sauce and Bruce Willis. Everything else was taken to the extreme, seemingly just to show that they could.
Tell No One - French thriller that resembles a dish of The Fugitive with a small helping of Gone, Baby Gone. While I don't want to sound stupid, this thing is pretty complex, maybe even a bit too much so. A few of the angles are there, but they're straining. It might be a little easier to follow if I could understand the original dialogue, or maybe I'm just a horrible subtitle reader. Either way, this is a quick mover that boasts a great turn from Francois Cluzet in the lead.
Let the Right One In - Believe the hype. I still don't know if I saw the version with the first translation subtitles or the later one, with the "dumbed-down" edits. If this was the latter, even though the former should always be preferred, it doesn't hurt the film enough to matter. While I guess this could be considered a genre film, it has little in the way of bombarding action or mystery. Instead, any sort of set piece comes quick and end quick, leaving you little time to ponder an interpretation of the actions as good or bad until they start piling up and relationships end and begin. In fact, the movie can trick you into thinking things when you're not considering what might really be occurring. Maybe a better word than thinking is believing, or wanting to believe. Even the title gets in on the act. The great thing is, you don't even need to look at the section underneath, and can instead just see a vampire story with enough character and slight twists to make it stand out. In fact, when you do take a look below, what's on the surface might turn irrevocably tragic.
Charley Varrick - 1970s crime picture that was hyped up in the excellent backmatter of Criminal, the Ed Brubaker and Sean Phillips comic series everyone should be buying. Great performances by Walter Matthau as the lead bank robber and Joe Don Baker as the hitman put onto him after Varrick ends up with mob money on accident. Story is very well plotted out, with no ridiculous intrusions or characters showing up out of nowhere to solve the problem. If you like crime drama, it's well worth your time.
Blue Velvet - The first David Lynch film I've ever watched. The famous symbolism is actually more blatant than I was expecting and to some might seem ridiculously apparent and lacking in effect. I didn't really have a problem with it and at the time I can see it being totally fresh. Also now potentially stale is the focus on stripping back the idyllic framing of small-town America, but Lynch is smart enough to not go totally overboard into some hard-boiled, over-the-top thriller and instead keeps everything grounded enough to where the unease slowly creeps up on you rather than it being loud and constantly in your face. Oh, and Dennis Hopper's character is really menacing in the best, unpredictable way.
Dr. Strangelove - Peter Sellers is tremendous and the film does a great job of laughing at the complete insanity of the Cold War period and how it could affect the people in positions of power. A great black comedy.
Gattaca - I think this is considered by some to be one of the better, newer sci-fi movies but I just could not get into it. The story breaks down into a really pretentious self-empowerment tale of overcoming, no matter what the odds, don't give up hope, you can't quit! The genetics focus is kind of interesting, but as a consequence of the ever advancing nature of sci-fi (for better or worse), it all seems tame and rehashed. The art style also really bugged me, with this potential near-future technology merged with a retro American vibe that never gets an explanation. The performances seemed flat and didn't do enough to make up for the lackluster other parts.
The Constant Gardener - One of the recent tales that exposes those nasty corporations for their nefarious deeds that shit all over the world and turn us all into mindless trademark machines. Fortunately that predictable and pointless premise is overshadowed by the nuances and reality of the relationship of main players Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz. The film also has a very rough, under-produced feel that helps to reinforce how the film plays out. This might be a thriller, but none of these characters suddenly morph into Jason Bourne so we can see a half-baked shootout. I mean, I like The Fugitive plenty, but enough already. The ending sadly returns to Importantville again so we can show how once we bust one corrupt person, everything will change. Don't pay attention to the legions waiting in line behind him. On actually promoting a message well, the film does prominently showcase the horrors and problems facing Africa without actually screaming it to the rafters.
Blood Simple - The Coen Bros. first movie didn't grab me as all their others I've seen have. It certainly has potential and the story contains their often requisite crazy angles that breaks down into a somewhat standard drama with crime elements. The idiosyncratic characters are toned down quite a bit or completely absent and the humor is relegated to a few sparing moments, though still embedded with the ridiculousness of everyday life that packs their later films. More so than all that is the film seems bogged down, lacking their usual verve and snap. It's by no means bad, but just sort of there. Overall, it failed to really grab me and make me take notice. Would I feel different if it wasn't a production of the two brothers I've come to heartily admire? Probably. As it is, good but they've done better.
Barton Fink - Watching this afterwards, however, was like good ol' Joel and Ethan flicking the lights straight back to bright. While definitive statements from me should be viewed with a skeptical eye and carry little meaning, this is the most postmodern film I've ever seen. So if you were agitated by No Country for Old Men, do not get near this beast. Anger will flourish and rampages will bloom. The plot is set up quickly and never really develops past an initial stage of John Turturro as a playwright reaching out to the common man, lured away by Hollywood. He's excellent as always, as is fellow Coen staple Jon Goodman. If you like heaps of metaphors, allusions, comparisons and reflections on topics ranging from intellectualism, famous writers and fascism, find this thing. I'm sure as hell glad I did.
Planet Terror - I don't see how people can condemn Death Proof while anointing this as hugely superior. Well, I guess I can, and what I'm really saying is I disagree. The big flaw I see is that Rodriguez cared more about making a tribute to the Grindhouse ideal than actually creating a strong overall work, which in a way is the opposite of what Tarantino did. In the face of the praise I just couldn't get past being underwhelmed. There are some good performances and running ideas throughout, like the restaraunt owner who never gets a customer yet still searches for the perfect BBQ sauce and Bruce Willis. Everything else was taken to the extreme, seemingly just to show that they could.
Tell No One - French thriller that resembles a dish of The Fugitive with a small helping of Gone, Baby Gone. While I don't want to sound stupid, this thing is pretty complex, maybe even a bit too much so. A few of the angles are there, but they're straining. It might be a little easier to follow if I could understand the original dialogue, or maybe I'm just a horrible subtitle reader. Either way, this is a quick mover that boasts a great turn from Francois Cluzet in the lead.
Let the Right One In - Believe the hype. I still don't know if I saw the version with the first translation subtitles or the later one, with the "dumbed-down" edits. If this was the latter, even though the former should always be preferred, it doesn't hurt the film enough to matter. While I guess this could be considered a genre film, it has little in the way of bombarding action or mystery. Instead, any sort of set piece comes quick and end quick, leaving you little time to ponder an interpretation of the actions as good or bad until they start piling up and relationships end and begin. In fact, the movie can trick you into thinking things when you're not considering what might really be occurring. Maybe a better word than thinking is believing, or wanting to believe. Even the title gets in on the act. The great thing is, you don't even need to look at the section underneath, and can instead just see a vampire story with enough character and slight twists to make it stand out. In fact, when you do take a look below, what's on the surface might turn irrevocably tragic.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Random
1. Starting Darren Sproles in place of Thomas Jones in fantasy football this week. With LT out, Sproles is going to have an even bigger workload than last week when he put up over 20 points against the Ravens defense. Jones's weakness is his incosistency, highlighted by a big week one and abysmal week two. Also hurting his value is Leon Washington getting the majority of the work near the goal line. This week the Jets play Tennessee, who have shut down the run so far but been weak against the pass. That could increase his value some, as he traditionally gets close to half or more of his points receiving out of the backfield. Sproles, meanwhile, is facing an improving Miami defense that nontheless likely won't be able to shut down the run as well as the Ravens did. That's why I'm going with Sproles, in my first big decision of the season.
2. I still can't tell if Quinton Jackson is seriously going to retire. Rampage certainly has been prone to rash statements and actions in the past, and this could be just the latest. On the other hand, Jackson has enough of a name and personality to sustain himself without ever stepping back into a cage or ring. From my angle, some of his gripes seem ill-founded and preposterous. Refusing to drop the fans booing him when he beat Liddell got old a long time ago. Rampage has to be one of the popular fighters in the organization now, but he seems to think everyone's against him. Equally hollow is his assertion that his fans saw him as being afraid of Machida. You don't have to be an MMA expert to know Rampage is not going to back down from anyone because he is afraid. For other reasons, like he talks about, sure, but not that. Him bringing up Dana White in particular as a reason is interesting, even though I think White had some ground to voice the opinions he did, even if he did so in his usual irritating, childish way. I'm assuming we won't know anything at least until the A-Team movie is done filming.
3. I love cooperative multiplayer video games. I think it's one of the best new trends emerging in development today. However, not having people you know and are halfway reliable is a huge crutch that needs to be overcome, even though don't ask me to figure it out. Constantly being at the mercy of the host in games where you progress through levels or waves, like in Gears of War 2's Horde Mode or presumably Halo: ODST's Firefight Mode, can get really frustrating when the game suddenly ends and you're back at square one. Like I said, a solution isn't something I can think of. Potentially the players who drop out could receive a penalty of some sorts in-game, but I don't know if that's really the answer because of all that it implies. So somebody else get on it, because I want to play Horde Mode.
2. I still can't tell if Quinton Jackson is seriously going to retire. Rampage certainly has been prone to rash statements and actions in the past, and this could be just the latest. On the other hand, Jackson has enough of a name and personality to sustain himself without ever stepping back into a cage or ring. From my angle, some of his gripes seem ill-founded and preposterous. Refusing to drop the fans booing him when he beat Liddell got old a long time ago. Rampage has to be one of the popular fighters in the organization now, but he seems to think everyone's against him. Equally hollow is his assertion that his fans saw him as being afraid of Machida. You don't have to be an MMA expert to know Rampage is not going to back down from anyone because he is afraid. For other reasons, like he talks about, sure, but not that. Him bringing up Dana White in particular as a reason is interesting, even though I think White had some ground to voice the opinions he did, even if he did so in his usual irritating, childish way. I'm assuming we won't know anything at least until the A-Team movie is done filming.
3. I love cooperative multiplayer video games. I think it's one of the best new trends emerging in development today. However, not having people you know and are halfway reliable is a huge crutch that needs to be overcome, even though don't ask me to figure it out. Constantly being at the mercy of the host in games where you progress through levels or waves, like in Gears of War 2's Horde Mode or presumably Halo: ODST's Firefight Mode, can get really frustrating when the game suddenly ends and you're back at square one. Like I said, a solution isn't something I can think of. Potentially the players who drop out could receive a penalty of some sorts in-game, but I don't know if that's really the answer because of all that it implies. So somebody else get on it, because I want to play Horde Mode.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)